Monday, December 23, 2013

Controversial letter: Gowon, Danjuma caution OBJ, others

Former President Obasanjo
A former Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (retd.) and a former Minister of Defence, Gen. Theophilus Danjuma, have cautioned Nigerians, especially those who have held leadership positions, against making utterances which could throw the country into chaos.

The two spoke in separate goodwill messages at the 6th edition of the Abuja Festival of Praise held at the International Conference Centre, Abuja, on Friday.

In a veiled reference to a letter written by ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo, Gowon advised Nigerians, especially past and present leaders, against saying  things that could further destabilise the nation. He said Nigerians would be the ones to suffer, if there was no peace in the country.

Gowon said, “Let all Nigerians — the leadership and the followership — make sure that we do not make utterances or say things that can really create problems for the leadership and for the country because if that happens, if we listen to such utterances, there shall be no peace and we will be the sufferers for it.

“I want all of us as faithfuls to bear in mind that this country needs peace and this peace can only come from all of us, the leadership — past and present — and from all of us. We must play our part to ensure that there is peace in the country.” He explained that this became necessary in view of recent happenings in the country.

Speaking in a similar vein, Danjuma noted that even though he was mentioned in Obasanjo’s letter, he had refrained from commenting on it. He said there was no need to go public on the issue because he had unfettered access to the president and would speak with him “face to face.” Danjuma said, “The press have been after me; they want me to react to what Obasanjo said about Mr. President (Goodluck Jonathan) and I told them that I have complete access to the President. And if I have anything to say to him, I will do so face to face. “These are very difficult times and we must be careful, especially as leaders, of what we say in public.”

President Jonathan, who was represented at the occasion by the Minister of Police Affairs, Navy Capt. Caleb Olubolade (retd), said prayers and songs of praise could save the nation and give hope for a greater nation.

He quoted the President as saying, “I strongly believe thy prayers and songs of praise like this can save the nation and give hope for a greater tomorrow in Nigeria; the land the good Lord has given to us.”

Meanwhile, a former Senate President, Senator Ameh Ebute, has said the Peoples Democratic Party must take decisive actions against Obasanjo. Ebute said this in a statement in Abuja on Saturday, while commenting on the controversial letter.

But in a reaction by one of his aides, Mr. Tunde Oladunjoye, Obasanjo said nothing could distract him.
Quoting Obasanjo, Oladunjoye, in an SMS to our correspondent, said, “I am an incurable optimist on Nigeria. I am a believer in Nigeria. I am committed to Nigeria. Nothing, nothing, nothing will distract me.”
Ebute  alleged that Obasanjo had succeeded in persuading his cronies to stir unending controversy in the PDP.

He further alleged that the former president  was on a mission to destroy the party and truncate the country’s hard won democracy. He stated, “We therefore call on the leadership of party to take a decisive action against him as nobody is greater than the party.

“Chief Obasanjo, to all intents, has demonstrated more anti-party activities than anyone else in the history of the PDP.” On the leadership of the PDP, Ebute said it was ridiculous that Obasanjo accused Jonathan of being responsible for the lingering crisis in the PDP. He stated that the crisis pre-dated Jonathan’s emergence as the leader of the party. Ebute stated, “No period in the history of our fledgling democracy has witnessed a higher turnover of the PDP national chairmen than the eight- year tenure of Chief Obasanjo as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.” The former senate president said those who were removed included Chief Solomon Lar; Barnabas Gemade and Audu Ogbeh. 

He said, “As Chief Obasanjo bestrode the PDP like an intimidating colossus, electoral decency was jettisoned, internal democracy trampled upon and good conscience buried as he dealt ruthlessly with all perceived enemies regardless of democratic culture and ethos.”

According to him, casualties of Obasanjo’s high-handed leadership included the late Senator Chuba Okadigbo; Senator Ayim Pius Ayim; a former Governor of Plateau State, Joshua Dariye and his Abia State counterpart, Orji Kalu.

On the headship of the Federal Government, he said it was perfidious for Obasanjo to set the National Assembly against the President in discussing corruption. Ebute, added, “It is common knowledge that corruption attained monumental heights under the regime of  Obasanjo as President.

“Obasanjo presided over the proceeds of Nigeria’s oil and gas for six years, without transparent accounting as the de facto Minister of Petroleum Resources.”

As the chief security officer, Ebute said that Obasanjo performed woefully. He stated that another gory absurdity was  Obasanjo’s allegation that the President Jonathan was training snipers where Abacha trained his killer squad and that about 1000 high profile politicians were on a watch list.

According to him, for an allegation as weighty, Obasanjo should know  that the onus of proof lies on him.
He stated, “We demand that the relevant security agencies like NSA, Directorate of State Security, Nigerian Intelligence Agency, the Nigeria Police, should immediately take decisive appropriate action to investigate this very sensitive national security issue and make their findings public.

“The security services must carry out this investigation with dispatch because we suspect that there is a grand plan to assassinate some high profile Nigerians, in the context of this very dangerous allegation, to intimidate and coerce President Jonathan to abdicate his right to contest in 2015.”

On the fight against corruption, Ebute said the agencies tasked to deal with corruption must be given a free hand to work. He said, “We state that Obasanjo’s letter is at best self-serving and holds no grain of patriotism and national interest.

“Through this blatant charade of promoting falsehood, innuendoes and untruths, Obasanjo attempts to raise a mob action against President Jonathan, a crafty follow-up to the rebellion he used the G 7 governors he planted in the states to stir up crisis in the PDP in order to stop Jonathan in 2015.”

Obasanjo had in an open letter to Jonathan accused him of paying lip service to corruption and pursing personal interest instead of that of the ruling People’s Democratic Party.

He also demanded that the President come clean of allegations that he was training snipers, while placing 1,000 people on a watch list.

I will not react to Jonathan’s reply, says Obasanjo

Former President Obasanjo
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has said he will not react to the response of President Goodluck Jonathan to his letter.

Jonathan had on Sunday sent an 11-page reply to Obasanjo’s letter, dated December 2 and titled ‘Before it is too late’, where the President debunked various allegations leveled against him by the Obasanjo ranging from corruption; Jonathan 2015 ambition; to training of a killer squad.

In a statement on Monday by Obasanjo’s Media aide, Tunde Oladunjoye,  the ex-president said he had fulfilled his desire to call the attention of Jonathan to salient issues, adding that he would no longer elaborate on the content on the letter.

The statement read, “Since the publication of the letter written by the President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, which was in response to the letter earlier written by revered former President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR; we have received several requests from local and international media asking to know Chief Obasanjo’s reaction to Mr. President’s response.

“One, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR, acknowledges Mr. President’s letter/response. However, Baba, as he already indicated in his December 2, 2013 letter,  does not wish to make further comments beyond the contents of his last letter to Mr. President or react to the said letter/response from Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan. Let me quote from page fourteen, paragraph two of Chief Obasanjo’s letter to Mr. President dated December 2, 2013 and titled Before It Is Too Late:

‘I will maintain my serenity, because by this letter I have done my duty to you as I have always done, to your government, to the party, PDP, and to our country, Nigeria’.


“Two, let me reiterate here, that Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR has tremendous respect for the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

The statement added, “Chief Olusegun Obasanjo sincerely appreciates all of you, my cherished colleagues; gentlemen and women of the media profession, who have been very upright, ethical and robust on the subject matter.”

Confab to start February 10

President Jonathan
BARRING unforeseen adjustments, the proposed national conference may begin on Monday, February 10, 2014, Vanguard has gathered.

This is after a harmonisation committee would have finished harmonising the modalities for the confab, a presidency source told Vanguard at the weekend.

The source said members of the committee may include Secretary to the Government of the Federation, SGF, Senator Anyim Pius Anyim; some members of the Presidential Committee on National Dialogue, which last week submitted a 4000-page report to President Goodluck Jonathan; and Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

The source said: “The harmonisation committee, which will be led by the SGF, will meet with the members of the Dr Okurounmu confab committee to harmonise the modalities. “Thereafter, they will meet with the Finance Minister to work out how the conference will be funded. All these will take about one month so that the conference will begin in the second week or middle of February, next year.”

Agbakoba’s reaction

Speaking on preparations for the confab, former Nigeria Bar Association National President, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), said: “History has not produced this type of moment in a long time. Therefore, we must take it very seriously.

“I thought the people who should be invited should be the ethnic nationalities; they make up Nigeria. And that it should not be a talk shop.

“We should have six geo-political mini conferences. So that as an Onitsha man, the challenge of an Onitsha man being governor of Anambra State is localised in the South-East and that is where we will discuss it.
“But the challenge of South-East having equal states with the other zones is a matter for the national conference.

“So the mini-conference gives opportunity for the ethnic nationalities in the zone to shape out their problems, pre-sent their report and nominate 15 people to move forward. “The other zones will also nominate 15 people each. At the national conference level, the representation should be equal. If the Presidency wishes to nominate 120 representatives, nothing is wrong with it. He is the executive President, he has a view. “There is nothing wrong with the National Assembly sending their representatives because you cannot exclude anybody.

‘Outcome must be followed’

The important thing is that the discussion should not be altered. If it says we should return to parliamentary system or Westminster model so be it. “If it says let’s retain the presidential system or go for single tenure, which Senator Ike Ekweremadu irrelevant-ly brought in, so be it.

“Even though he has a point, Ekweremadu brought it in wrongly. Every system has its political value. The way Ekweremadu’s point sounds, it is as if there is going to be mago mago or as if the National Assembly will receive the constitution and put a clause in it.

“I wish he had not said that because I actually believe in that. Nigeria is in political evolution and one of the problems is succession. If that is the problem and we spend billions and trillions of naira then let people go for one term.

“I wish Ekweremadu had kept his powder dry and allowed it to be a common agreement. I hope that all these issues will be discussed at the conference. “Nigeria is not in the best of shape. We need politicians who have statesmanlike qualities of Mandela because Nigeria is a great country with huge natural resources.
“The national conference should be on how to make Nigeria work. In doing this, Chief Bola Ige’s two questions must be answered. Do we want to stay together? How do we want to stay together?”

Ikokwu wants restructuring

Also, Second Republic politician, Chief Guy Ikokwu, threw his weight behind the proposed conference, which he hoped will help address the country’s numerous developmental challenges.

On the issue of revenue expenditure, for instance, he said: “It is necessary that there should be constitutional provision for all the tiers of government not to exceed 40 per cent of their budget of recurrent expenditure, while reserving the balance of 60 per cent for capital expenditure.

“The implementation of this quota will lead to the greater development of the country. “Abuja should not exercise more than 30 per cent of its present powers, while the six zones, which should become the federating units, will have more regional powers than the states have at the moment. “Each of the zones can create as many states as it requires without the need for another tier of local government structure so that the states will assume the powers of the former local government thus reducing administration cost.

“With this zonal structure there will be more discipline and bigger political parties thus reducing the incidents of corruption, which is presently plaguing the whole country. “It will, therefore, be necessary to increase the private participation in developmental works so that the government agencies will cease to become the controllers of the work force and jobs, which will now go to SMEs or other big private organisations as we have in the United States, Germany, India and even China.

On looting, confab funding

“There should be constitutional stipulations for those who loot the economy or embezzle funds, as we have seen in the pension scam or the oil and gas sector, to be punishable by death or long periods of imprisonment with reparation without any option of fine.

“In this a way corruption will certainly reduce to a great extent with high quality education, civility and morality will certainly increase.” He suggested that the conference should be funded through the budgetary provisions of a supplementary bill enabling the zones to be financially accommodated on an equal basis and the conference should be able to complete its work within nine months in 2014.

On modalities for decisions, he suggested decisions at the conference should be by consensus and negotiations or, in some cases, as shall be decided at the opening of the conference by a vast majority of at least two-third of the delegates to break any dead lock that might hinder the conference.

On legality

To legalise the outcome of the exercise, Ikokwu canvassed said: “The President shall use the National Assembly machinery for the formalisa-tion of the conference and for a referendum with regard to the eventual decisions of the conference. “The National Assembly should not amend or veto any conference decisions and shall, at the end of the referendum, promulgate a new national constitution in such a way that had been done before, at independence or at the 1963 Republican Constitution.”

Source: Vanguard

Impeaching President Jonathan will stabilise Nigeria's democracy, says APC

Mr. Lai Mohammed of APC
The Interim National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, Mr. Lai Mohammed, reiterates the party’s call for the impeachment of President Goodluck Jonathan, in this interview with ALLWELL OKPI

The All Progressives Congress recently called for the impeachment of President Goodluck Jonathan. What prompted this call? 

In our press release, we gave reasons for our asking for the President to be impeached. One is that we are running a democracy and particularly, it is a presidential system of government. That being so, it provides for separation of powers. Power is shared by the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. The system gives a lot of powers to the executive, but being conscious of human nature that this power could be abused, it also provides for checks and balances. That is why the constitution says the president or the governor can be removed if he is found guilty of charges of gross misconduct. In principle, what we said and did was simply following the constitution, which allows for the president to be impeached.

Can you mention the actions of President Jonathan that constitute gross misconduct?

We said the responsibility of any government is the security and welfare of the citizenry. The administration has failed to live up to the justification of its existence. We also complained of total failure of leadership, which has given birth to insecurity, unprecedented level of corruption, palpable impunity, massive unemployment, among other things. We gave examples of each of these. This country is currently swimming in corruption: Is it the oil subsidy scam that you want to talk about? Or the armoured vehicles scam? Or the pension scam? Or is it the N8trn missing fund discovered by the Central Bank of Nigeria, that you want to talk about? Or is it the missing SURE-P fund you want to talk about or the arbitrary distribution of money from the ecological fund to the cronies of the President? 

Or is it the impunity that has been going on for about one year in Rivers State that you want to talk about? The commissioner of police in Rivers has become the de facto chief executive. Let anybody say any of these did not happen or that any of them does not constitute gross misconduct. And for crying out loud, when did asking for the impeachment of the President become treasonable felony? This is a government that has run out of ideas. Everywhere in the world, parties call for the impeachment of the President. Even in the US, small parties call for the impeachment of Barack Obama for frivolous reasons. When has it become sacrilegious to ask that the President be impeached? If it was so, the constitution would not have put the impeachment clause there.

Did the letter by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to Jonathan play any role in your call for the President’s impeachment, considering that it was revealed a few days earlier?         

No, it (the letter) was not on the list. The letter only reinforced our call, but it is not on the list. The things on the list were not taken out of the letter. If we are going to be honest to ourselves, there is no issue in the letter, except the training of snipers and putting 1000 people on Jonathan’s political watch list. There is nothing in Obasanjo’s letter that we have not been saying. Is it about impunity; is it security; is it corruption? 

We have even spoken more than what Obasanjo wrote. If we are to compile what we have said about this administration, it would be a book, not a letter. It is interesting that even people in Jonathan’s party have said exactly what we have been saying about his administration; Obasanjo on one hand and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, on the other hand. Tambuwal said the body language of the President showed that he was encouraging corruption. Two months ago, we said he was an accessory to corruption; that his body language showed that he was not ready to fight corruption.

The Presidency has accused APC of seizing every opportunity to heat up the polity and has charged you with treasonable felony. What’s your reaction to that?

If the President is sure that he is not guilty of any of these misconducts, why is he afraid? Clearly, the answer to call for impeachment is not a charge of treasonable felony.

Considering how heated up the polity is ahead of 2015 elections, don’t you think impeaching the President now will throw this country into chaos?

How? Will it be the first time in a democracy that a president will be impeached?

But it would be the first in Nigeria.

Of course, we are a young democracy, that’s why. Nothing will stabilise Nigeria’s democracy more that the impeachment of the President; it will show people that democracy is not just about the right to choose your leaders, but also the right and the ability to get rid of them when they don’t perform.

With the rigorous process of impeaching a president, do you think it is possible for the National Assembly to impeach Jonathan?

What is the rigour? To serve the notice, you need only one-third of the members. You don’t need two-third to serve notice of impeachment. The next thing is to call the Chief Justice of Nigeria and put forth the allegations for him (Jonathan) to defend. If they are not satisfied, the CJN will constitute a committee. People will be shocked that by the time the process gain momentum, more and more people will join the impeachment train. We absolutely have no doubt in our minds that it is doable.

That means APC will be banking on its increased strength in the National Assembly.

Frankly speaking, most of these allegations are not wrongs against APC alone; they are wrongs and misdeeds affecting entire Nigeria. If you talk corruption and insecurity, even some states controlled by the Peoples Democratic Party suffer it more than APC states. You will be shocked that people that you think are on the President’s side will join the train of impeachment. So many people, who have been groaning but have not had the opportunity to air their views, will join.

Source: Punch

Christmas is idolatrous, says Pator Kumuyi

Pastor W.F Kumuyi
The General Overseer of the Deeper Christian Life Ministry, Pastor W.F Kumuyi, has again warned members of the church against celebrating Christmas, saying the annual celebration of Christmas is idolatrous and unscriptural.

Kumuyi warned that partaking in the celebration made Christians to go back from the commandment of Jesus Christ. The cleric said this on Saturday at the annual national December convention of the church, which held at the church’s camp ground in Ogun State. He said, “We don’t celebrate Christmas. It actually came from idolatrous background. That is why you don’t hear us sing what they call Christmas carol. Never! We always say it is the December retreat.

We are only gathering together because it is the holiday period and love the Lord more, and rededicate ourselves more. “When you find anybody coming in, or any leader, trying to introduce the idolatry of mystery Babylon, that they call Christmas and you want to bring all the Christmas carol saying that is the day that Jesus was born, and you don’t find that in the Acts of the Apostles or in the early church, then you don’t find that in the church either. If you don’t know that before, now you know.”

He warned that any of the church’s leaders that tried to introduce the “idolatry of Christmas” into any section of the church would be sanctioned, while also encouraging other believers in Christ to jettison the celebration as part of their sacrifice to perfection. Kumuyi said the duty of the church was to make people more like Jesus Christ and not join in worldly celebrations. “We are not trying to make the church turn like the world. We want it to be like Jesus Christ, and more like the Apostles. If you don’t have that mind with us, then you have permission to go to other places,” he added.

But the Director of Social Communications, Catholic Archdiocese of Lagos, Monsignor Gabriel Osu, in his reaction to Kumuyi’s proclamation, said, “I don’t know what he means by saying the practice of celebrating Christmas is wrong. “Is he saying that Christ wasn’t born? That he didn’t come to die for us? Does he not celebrate his own birthday? Do Kumuyi’s pastors not celebrate him? It is not everything I react to; some people just seek attention. If Kumuyi is a Christian, then he must believe in Christ. “The celebration of Christmas didn’t just start today; it is too public an event for anyone to say that they don’t know what it is about.

“If Kumuyi is condemning the commercialisation of Christmas, I can understand that. Christ came to redeem us from our lost state; this was actualised through his coming, his birth; that is why we celebrate Christmas. It is the fulfilment of God’s promise.” “I saw him on the television a few days ago. He was in Akwa Ibom State and was the chief preacher during their Christmas celebration event. Kumuyi is just saying what he feels; he is not making any doctrinal statement.”

The spokesperson for the Christian Association of Nigeria, Oshodi chapter, Lagos State, Pastor Barnabas Otoibhi, said that Christmas was worth celebrating. Otoibhi told one our correspondents in a telephone interview that the origin of Christmas was not as important as its essence. He said, “The origin of Christmas, as we know it, could be traced to Roman Emperor, Constantine. Christmas was a day for celebrating the Sun God. However, because Constantine was a Christian, the day was changed to commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ.

“The tradition has continued to date and since the aim of Christmas is to celebrate Jesus since there is nothing bad in honouring Jesus. Also, the worship of the Sun God was done in Rome and not everywhere in the world, so it is not part of our history. “We mark Christmas with the singing of songs as a day, which has now been consecrated.”

Source: Punch

Alleged unremitted $49.8bn: Is this a mischief?

Mallam Sanusi, CBN Governor
A letter dated September 25, 2013 written by Lamido Sanusi, Governor of Central Bank, to President, Good Luck Jonathan, was last week, leaked to the media from undisclosed sources.

In an apparent streak of patriotic fervour, Sanusi noted in his letter that “I am constrained to formally write your Excellency, documenting serious concerns of the CBN on the continuous failure of the NNPC to repatriate significant proportion of the proceeds of the crude oil shipment it made ($49.8bn), in gross violation of the law”.

Nonetheless, Sanusi’s antecedent in exposing the horrid level of fraudulent practices in the banking sector, as well as his expose’ on the bloated expenditure of legislators, may have induced public belief in Lamido’s allegations of fraud against NNPC. The NNPC General Manager Public Affairs, Dr. Umar Farouk Ibrahim, however, quickly explained that the 24% of total crude oil receipts ($15.5bn), which the CBN acknowledged that NNPC remitted to the treasury actually represents the proceeds from the equity lifting, which NNPC directly paid as its legitimate contribution to the federation account.

Thus, the alleged unremitted balance of 76%, according to Ibrahim, was received by those other agencies that are statutorily empowered to collect them for onward remittance to the treasury. Indeed, Dr. Okonjo-Iweala, the Finance Minister, also last week corroborated this position to the Senate Committee on SureP, when she confirmed that the $48.8bn alleged missing was ‘intact’, only to reverse her position a day later, when she reported that about $10.8bn was yet to be accounted for! Earlier, Andrew Yakubu, NNPC Group Managing Director, cautioned government ministries and development agencies to “seek better understanding of issues, which are not clear to them, rather than go public with misleading information that is capable of creating public disaffection”.

Consequently, with such contradictory positions on a matter as basic as appropriate accounting process for public funds, one must wonder what other more serious issues these critical government agencies discuss at their regular inter-ministerial meetings. Thus, in addition to ongoing legislative investigation, it should be revealing to also publish the result of President Jonathan’s alleged presidential directive, upon receipt of Sanusi’s letter, that the huge revenue differences between NNPC and CBN records should be instantly resolved.

Nonetheless, a commonsense approach may serve our purpose in determining a clearer reality. Indeed, CBN’s expectation that total sales value, i.e. average price of crude oil multiplied by the actual volume of oil sold should amount to $65bn is really hardly contestable! It is also true that the 1999 constitution requires monies earned by all government agencies to be paid into the federation account. So, CBN’s allegation may be technically right, if NNPC paid only $15.5bn instead of $65bn into the treasury; however, the big question is whether it is realistic for a trading corporation to directly pay its gross sales revenue as dividends to its shareholders? Surely, it is only after cost of all operations and several other contractual obligations, including taxes, have been met that any corporation can pay dividends to shareholders!

Consequently, it would be inapplicable therefore, for NNPC to repatriate the gross sales revenue for all oil sales directly into the federation account. Surely, this could not be the intention of Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution on which the CBN founded its allegation of fraud against NNPC. Besides, other agencies apart from NNPC are also partially accountable for crude revenue. The above discussion is not a clean bill for NNPC’s operations, as it will clearly be a miracle, under current circumstances, to find any MDA with unblemished accounting records and uncompromised operational processes nationwide.

Besides, NNPC is yet to satisfactorily account for its 400,000 barrels daily crude allocation for local refining! Nonetheless, in his letter, Sanusi also recommended “investigation of those obvious avenues for money laundering, such as companies that sell private jets in Nigeria, and those bureaux de change, which have purchased hundreds of billions of dollars from the interbank market and are unable to account for these monies”. Consequently, Lamido assured President Jonathan of CBN’s “readiness to render full assistance and provide as much data as possible to support the prosecution of such errant companies”.

We may wonder whether this is the same Sanusi, who clearly did not require presidential consent, before his swashbuckling controversial reforms of the banking sector or is this not the same firebrand, who took on the otherwise intimidating Legislature on their bloated expenditures without batting an yelid! Why couldn’t the same irrepressible CBN Governor simply pass on its substantial information dossier on suspects of money laundering transactions directly for investigation instead of unexpectedly circuitously inviting Mr. President to authorize prosecution!!

Thus, observers may see Sanusi’s fundamentally, clearly unfounded exposé as subterfuge to distract public attention from CBN’s evident failure to achieve its core mandate of price stability, which should normally drive economic growth; undoubtedly, no nation has successfully grown its economy and also stimulated employment opportunities with cost of funds to the real sector exceeding 20%, neither can there be sustained social welfare, when pensioners become paupers every decade or so, because of double digit inflation rates in recent years!

There is also nothing to be said in favour of CBN’s ‘economically poisonous’ monetary strategy, which constantly increases the cash base of banks one day with huge public sector naira allocations, only to return to mop up (i.e. borrow back) the resultant suffocating cash surfeit from the same banks with double digit interest rates, which are inappropriately excessive for such risk free sovereign debts! Indeed, we should not be reminded of CBN’s self-styled own reserves of about $40bn, which, despite government’s forced borrowings at ‘Shylock’ interest rates to fund ghost deficits, yet remain inexplicably idle but unavailable for public appropriation!

Or why should anyone gloat on which income sources fund CBN’s billions of naira unilateral serial interventions nationwide! The preceding ‘minor’ infractions of the apex bank may not obviously be as dramatic as media reports of Sanusi’s exposure of an ‘Ogbologbo’ thief who allegedly ripped off 76% of our commonwealth!

SAVE THE NAIRA, SAVE NIGERIANS!!

Source: Vanguard

APC will soon collapse – Okupe

Dr. Doyin Okupe
The Presidency on Sunday boasted that it was not  perturbed by “the parade of the All Progressives Congress.” It said it was evident that the party was suffering from a leadership deficiency and  hence its  penchant for embarking on journeys  in search of leaders to give  it direction.

The Presidency, through the Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, therefore predicted that the APC would soon collapse. Okupe, in an interview with journalists after addressing a press conference on the achievements of President Goodluck Jonathan in Lagos, was apparently referring to the visit of the opposition party leaders to former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Saturday.

The APC leaders had also paid a similar visit to a former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar. But the APC, through one its leading members, Rotimi Fashakin, said the Jonathan Presidency had since “lost direction and does  not really know how to constructively engage the myriads of problems that are besetting it.”

Okupe however  expressed the  view that members of the APC seemed  to have forgotten that God had a hand in their seach for capable leaders. He said, “The APC boat is destined for the Red Sea and in fact, I remember that when we went to Israel, we prayed to God to remove all the people troubling Nigeria. So, by what is happening now, I believe that God is working quietly to gather these people. “By the time Jonathan defeats those giants, God will take all the glory and people will know that the APC is heading for failure.”
Okupe accused the APC leaders of insincerity,saying “when a Kwakwanso (apparent reference to Kano State Govenor …. Kwakwanso)  was in the Peoples Democratic Party, he was corrupt but  now,  he is a saint.”

Kwakwanso is one of the five  governors that  recently dumped the PDP for the APC. Okupe also used the opportunity to assure Nigerians  that  Jonathan would not sweep the allegations  against the Minister of Aviation, Ms. Stella Oduah, under the carpet. He, however, explained that it was on record that the   House of Representatives Committee on Aviation  which investigated the purchase of  two bulletproof cars at a whopping N255m did not convict Oduah of corruption. Okupe said, “You  should know that the House    has not convicted the minister of corruption but they said she did not follow due process in the purchase of the cars. “You should however have known that punishment is given to the guilty but you must ascertain before  the guilty is punished. I believe that the Presidency will do something  about  the allegation  and I can assure you that the matter will not be swept under the carpet.”

On Jonathan’s scorecard, the presidential aide  claimed that since the nation’s independence in 1960, no Nigerian leader  had matched the President’s achievements. He scored Jonathan  high in aviation, education, health, agriculture, sports, economic development,   power generation, among others. Okupe  frowned on the   “politicisation” of  the Boko Haram insurgency by opposition  political parties. He argued that  that   was the reason why some people believed that the present administration was not serious about the war  against the insurgents. 

He said the Federal government had succeeded in restricting the sect and weakening  its  influence.
But Fashakin described the Jonathan  administration as a colossal failure. Fashakin, who was the National Publicity Secretary of the defunct Congress for Progressive Change,  said it was laughable for anyone least of all, Okupe,  to score the President high in terms of performance. 

According to him, Nigerians need to know what led to Okupe’s ignominious exit from Obasanjo’s Presidency. He said, “The corruption that we witnessed during the Shagari era, the incompetence that we thought we saw during Shagari’s government in 1979-1983, is too infinitesimally small when compared to the incompetence that we see with this regime within the last three years. “We need to understand that this talk that this Presidency engages in is symptomatic of a leadership that has lost direction.” He said instead of the President to address the corruption linked to one of his ministers, he chose to set up an administrative panel but has not had the courage to make public its findings.

Meanwhile, the  PDP  leadership   has said it was  not angered by the meeting between Obasanjo and the leaders  of the APC. It said that since the former President told them  that he remained a card-carrying member of the ruling party,  the APC gained anything from the meeting. 

The Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the party, Alhaji Ibrahim Jalo, told one of  our correspondents in Abuja on Sunday, that  it would be wrong to crucify the former President because of the visit. He said, “The former President told his guests, the leaders of the APC, that he is still a card-carrying member of the PDP. This is not what the leaders of the APC bargained for.

“With the statement by the former President, he has not committed any offence and the statement that came from him must have angered the APC. So, why do we need to begin to make issues out of the meeting.”

Source: Punch

Obasanjo's letter: You lied, says Jonathan

L-R: President Goodluck, Obasanjo
President Goodluck Jonathan has accused former President Olusegun Obasanjo of deceitfully manipulating facts and figures to impugn his credibility, vowing that he would not for any reason mortgage a bright future for the country.

The President, in his response to the December 2, 2013 letter to him from the former president, accused his one time political benefactor of hypocrisy asserting that Obasanjo was rather guilty of several of the allegations raised.

Dr. Jonathan in debunking the allegations of having failed in maintaining security, reminded Obasanjo that the Boko Haram insurgency started under his watch in 2002 and that the first major case of kidnapping for money was also in 2006 during Obasanjo’s stewardship.

President Jonathan also challenged Obasanjo to swear with the bible if he believed in the allegation that the administration was training snipers to trail political opponents, just as he said that retractions by Central Bank governor, Lamido Sanusi have debunked the allegation of squandering oil receipts. Responding to the allegation of corruption leveled against the present administration, Dr. Jonathan poked at Obasanjo citing the Halliburton and Siemens scandals which happened under his brief, and the mockery of his military administration by his townsman, the music legend, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. He thus challenged Obasanjo to cite verifiable cases corruption against the present administration.

Dr. Jonathan also denied the allegations of betraying the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP charging that it was certainly not him that made the PDP to lose Obasanjo’s home state, OgunState to the opposition in 2011. President Jonathan who in the letter acknowledged Obasanjo’s role in his political enthronement and called him baba five times, nevertheless said he was forced to respond openly based on what he described as Obasanjo’s legendary role in pulling down all his successors since he was Head of State in the seventies.

The letter dated December 20, 2013 ran thus: December 20th 2013 His Excellency, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR Agbe L’Oba House, Quarry Road, Ibara, Abeokuta.

RE: BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE 

I wish to formally acknowledge your letter dated December 2, 2013 and other previous correspondence similar to it. You will recall that all the letters were brought to me by hand. Although both of us discussed some of the issues in those letters, I had not, before now, seen the need for any formal reply since, to me, they contained advice from a former President to a serving President. Obviously, you felt differently because in your last letter, you complained about my not acknowledging or replying your previous letters. It is with the greatest possible reluctance that I now write this reply. I am most uneasy about embarking on this unprecedented and unconventional form of open communication between me and a former leader of our country because I know that there are more acceptable and dignified means of doing so. But I feel obliged to reply your letter for a number of reasons: one, you formally requested for a reply and not sending you one will be interpreted as ignoring a former President.

Secondly, Nigerians know the role you have played in my political life and given the unfortunate tone of your letter, clearly, the grapes have gone sour. Therefore, my side of the story also needs to be told. The third reason why I must reply you in writing is that your letter is clearly a threat to national security as it may deliberately or inadvertently set the stage for subversion. The fourth reason for this reply is that you raised very weighty issues, and since the letter has been made public, Nigerians are expressing legitimate concerns.

A response from me therefore, becomes very necessary. The fifth reason is that this letter may appear in biographies and other books which political commentators on Nigeria’s contemporary politics may write. It is only proper for such publications to include my comments on the issues raised in your letter. Sixthly, you are very unique in terms of the governance of this country. You were a military Head of State for three years and eight months, and an elected President for eight years. That means you have been the Head of Government of Nigeria for about twelve years. This must have, presumably, exposed you to a lot of information. Thus when you make a statement, there is the tendency for people to take it seriously. The seventh reason is that the timing of your letter coincided with other vicious releases.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives spoke of my “body language” encouraging corruption. A letter written to me by the CBN Governor alleging that NNPC, within a period of 19 months did not remit the sum of USD49.8 billion to the federation account, was also deliberately leaked to the public. The eighth reason is that it appears that your letter was designed to incite Nigerians from other geopolitical zones against me and also calculated to promote ethnic disharmony. Worse still, your letter was designed to instigate members of our Party, the PDP, against me. The ninth reason is that your letter conveys to me the feeling that landmines have been laid for me.

Therefore, Nigerians need to have my response to the issues raised before the mines explode. The tenth and final reason why my reply is inevitable is that you have written similar letters and made public comments in reference to all former Presidents and Heads of Government starting from Alhaji Shehu Shagari and these have instigated different actions and reactions. The purpose and direction of your letter is distinctly ominous, and before it is too late, my clarifications on the issues need to be placed on record. Let me now comment on the issues you raised. In commenting I wish to crave your indulgence to compare what is happening now to what took place before.

This, I believe, will enable Nigerians see things in better perspective because we must know where we are coming from so as to appreciate where we now are, and to allow us clearly map out where we are going. You raised concerns about the security situation in the country. I assure you that I am fully aware of the responsibility of government for ensuring the security of the lives and property of citizens. My Administration is working assiduously to overcome current national security challenges, the seeds of which were sown under previous administrations. There have been some setbacks; but certainly there have also been great successes in our efforts to overcome terrorism and insurgency.

Those who continue to down-play our successes in this regard, amongst whom you must now be numbered, appear to have conveniently forgotten the depths to which security in our country had plunged before now. At a stage, almost the entire North-East of Nigeria was under siege by insurgents. Bombings of churches and public buildings in the North and the federal capital became an almost weekly occurrence. Our entire national security apparatus seemed nonplussed and unable to come to grips with the new threat posed by the berthing of terrorism on our shores. But my administration has since brought that very unacceptable situation under significant control.

We have overhauled our entire national security architecture, improved intelligence gathering, training, funding, logistical support to our armed forces and security agencies, and security collaboration with friendly countries with very visible and positive results. The scope and impact of terrorist operations have been significantly reduced and efforts are underway to restore full normalcy to the most affected North Eastern region and initiate a post-crisis development agenda, including a special intervention programme to boost the region’s socio-economic progress. In doing all this, we have kept our doors open for dialogue with the insurgents and their supporters through efforts such as the work of the Presidential Committee on Dialogue and the Peaceful Resolution of the Security Challenges in the North-East.

You also know that the Governor of Borno State provided the items you mentioned to me as carrots. Having done all this and more, it is interesting that you still accuse me of not acting on your hardly original recommendation that the carrot and stick option be deployed to solve the Boko Haram problem. Your suggestion that we are pursuing a “war against violence without understanding the root causes of the violence and applying solutions to deal with all the underlying factors” is definitely misplaced because from the onset of this administration, we have been implementing a multifaceted strategy against militancy, insurgency and terrorism that includes poverty alleviation, economic development, education and social reforms.

Even though basic education is the constitutional responsibility of States, my administration has, as part of its efforts to address ignorance and poor education which have been identified as two of the factors responsible for making some of our youth easily available for use as cannon fodder by insurgents and terrorists, committed huge funds to the provision of modern basic education schools for the Almajiri in several Northern States. The Federal Government under my leadership has also set up nine additional universities in the Northern States and three in the Southern States in keeping with my belief that proper education is the surest way of emancipating and empowering our people. More uncharitable persons may even see a touch of sanctimoniousness in your new belief in the carrot and stick approach to overcoming militancy and insurgency.

You have always referred to how you hit Odi in BayelsaState to curb militancy in the Niger Delta. If the invasion of Odi by the Army was the stick, I did not see the corresponding carrot. I was the Deputy Governor of BayelsaState then, and as I have always told you, the invasion of Odi did not solve any militancy problem but, to some extent, escalated it. If it had solved it, late President Yar’Adua would not have had to come up with the amnesty program. And while some elements of the problem may still be there, in general, the situation is reasonably better. In terms of general insecurity in the country and particularly the crisis in the Niger Delta, 2007 was one of the worst periods in our history.

You will recall three incidents that happened in 2007 which seemed to have been orchestrated to achieve sinister objectives. Here in Abuja, a petrol tanker loaded with explosives was to be rammed into the INEC building. But luckily for the country, an electric pole stopped the tanker from hitting the INEC building. It is clear that this incident was meant to exploit the general sense of insecurity in the nation at the time to achieve the aim of stopping the 2007 elections. It is instructive that you, on a number of occasions, alluded to this fact. When that incident failed, an armed group invaded Yenagoa one evening with the intent to assassinate me. Luckily for me, they could not. They again attacked and bombed my country home on a night when I was expected in the village.

Fortunately, as God would have it, I did not make the trip. I recall that immediately after both incidents, I got calls expressing the concern of Abuja. But Baba, you know that despite the apparent concern of Abuja, no single arrest was ever made. I was then the Governor of Bayelsa State and the PDP Vice-Presidential candidate. The security people ordinarily should have unraveled the assassination attempt on me. You also raised the issues of kidnapping, piracy and armed robbery. These are issues all Nigerians, including me are very concerned about. While we will continue to do our utmost best to reduce all forms of criminality to the barest minimum in our country, it is just as well to remind you that the first major case of kidnapping for ransom took place around 2006.

And the Boko Haram crisis dates back to 2002. Goodluck Jonathan was not the President of the country then. Also, armed robbery started in this country immediately after the civil war and since then, it has been a problem to all succeeding governments. For a former Head of Government, who should know better, to present these problems as if they were creations of the Jonathan Administration is most uncharitable. Having said that, let me remind you of some of the things we have done to curb violent crime in the country. We have reorganized the Nigerian Police Force and appointed a more dynamic leadership to oversee its affairs. We have also improved its manpower levels as well as funding, training and logistical support. We have also increased the surveillance capabilities of the Police and provided its air-wing with thrice the number of helicopters it had before the inception of the present administration.

The National Civil Defence and Security Corps has been armed to make it a much more effective ally of the police and other security agencies in the war against violent crime. At both domestic and international levels, we are doing everything possible to curb the proliferation of the small arms and light weapons with which armed robberies, kidnappings and piracy are perpetrated. We have also enhanced security at our borders to curb cross-border crimes. We are aggressively addressing the challenge of crude oil theft in collaboration with the state Governors.

In addition, the Federal Government has engaged the British and US governments for their support in the tracking of the proceeds from the purchase of stolen crude. Similarly, a regional Gulf of Guinea security strategy has been initiated to curb crude oil theft and piracy. Perhaps the most invidious accusation in your letter is the allegation that I have placed over one thousand Nigerians on a political watch list, and that I am training snipers and other militia to assassinate people. Baba, I don’t know where you got that from but you do me grave injustice in not only lending credence to such baseless rumours, but also publicizing it. You mentioned God seventeen times in your letter. Can you as a Christian hold the Bible and say that you truly believe this allegation?

The allegation of training snipers to assassinate political opponents is particularly incomprehensible to me. Since I started my political career as a Deputy Governor, I have never been associated with any form of political violence. I have been a President for over three years now, with a lot of challenges and opposition mainly from the high and mighty. There have certainly been cases of political assassination since the advent of our Fourth Republic, but as you well know, none of them occurred under my leadership. Regarding the over one thousand people you say are on a political watch list, I urge you to kindly tell Nigerians who they are and what agencies of government are “watching” them. Your allegation that I am using security operatives to harass people is also baseless.

Nigerians are waiting for your evidence of proof. That was an accusation made against previous administrations, including yours, but it is certainly not my style and will never be. Again, if you insist on the spurious claim that some of your relatives and friends are being harassed, I urge you to name them and tell Nigerians what agencies of my administration are harassing them. I also find it difficult to believe that you will accuse me of assisting murderers, or assigning a presidential delegation to welcome a murderer. This is a most unconscionable and untrue allegation. It is incumbent on me to remind you that I am fully conscious of the dictates of my responsibilities to God and our dear nation. It is my hope that devious elements will not take advantage of your baseless allegation to engage in brazen and wanton assassination of high profile politicians as before, hiding under the alibi your “open letter” has provided for them. Nevertheless, I have directed the security agencies and requested the National Human Rights Commission to carry out a thorough investigation of these criminal allegations and make their findings public.

That corruption is an issue in Nigeria is indisputable. It has been with us for many years. You will recall that your kinsman, the renowned afro-beat maestro, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti famously sang about it during your first stint as Head of State. Sonny Okosun also sang about corruption. And as you may recall, a number of Army Generals were to be retired because of corruption before the Dimka coup. Also, the late General Murtala Mohammed himself wanted to retire some top people in his cabinet on corruption-related issues before he was assassinated. Even in this FourthRepublic, the Siemens and Halliburton scandals are well known.

The seed of corruption in this country was planted a long time ago, but we are doing all that we can to drastically reduce its debilitating effects on national development and progress. I have been strengthening the institutions established to fight corruption. I will not shield any government official or private individual involved in corruption, but I must follow due process in all that I do. And whenever clear cases of corruption or fraud have been established, my administration has always taken prompt action in keeping with the dictates of extant laws and procedures.

You cannot claim to be unaware of the fact that several highly placed persons in our country, including sons of some of our party leaders are currently facing trial for their involvement in the celebrated subsidy scam affair. I can hardly be blamed if the wheels of justice still grind very slowly in our country, but we are doing our best to support and encourage the judiciary to quicken the pace of adjudication in cases of corruption. Baba, I am amazed that with all the knowledge garnered from your many years at the highest level of governance in our country, you could still believe the spurious allegation contained in a letter written to me by the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), and surreptitiously obtained by you, alleging that USD49.8 billion, a sum equal to our entire national budget for two years, is “unaccounted for” by the NNPC.

Since, as President, you also served for many years as Minister of Petroleum Resources, you very well know the workings of the corporation. It is therefore intriguing that you have made such an assertion. You made a lot of insinuations about oil theft, shady dealings at the NNPC and the NNPC not remitting the full proceeds of oil sales to the CBN. Now that the main source of the allegations which you rehashed has publicly stated that he was “misconstrued”, perhaps you will find it in your heart to apologize for misleading unwary Nigerians and impugning the integrity of my administration on that score.

Your claim of “Atlantic Oil loading about 130, 000 barrels sold by Shell and managed on behalf of NPDC with no sale proceeds paid into the NPDC account” is also disjointed and baseless because no such arrangement as you described exists between Atlantic Oil and the Nigeria Petroleum Development Company. NPDC currently produces about 138, 000 barrels of oil per day from over 7 producing assets. The Crude Oil Marketing Division (COMD) of the NNPC markets all of this production on behalf of NPDC with proceeds paid into NPDC account.

I am really shocked that with all avenues open to you as a former Head of State for the verification of any information you have received about state affairs, you chose to go public with allegations of “high corruption” without offering a shred of supporting evidence. One of your political “sons” similarly alleged recently that he told me of a minister who received a bribe of $250 Million from an oil company and I did nothing about it.

He may have been playing from a shared script, but we have not heard from him again since he was challenged to name the minister involved and provide the evidence to back his claim. I urge you, in the same vein, to furnish me with the names, facts and figures of a single verifiable case of the “high corruption” which you say stinks all around my administration and see whether the corrective action you advocate does not follow promptly. And while you are at it, you may also wish to tell Nigerians the true story of questionable waivers of signature bonuses between 2000 and 2007.

While, by the Grace of God Almighty, I am the first President from a minority group, I am never unmindful of the fact that I was elected leader of the whole of Nigeria and I have always acted in the best interest of all Nigerians. You referred to the divisive actions and inflammatory utterances of some individuals from the South-South and asserted that I have done nothing to call them to order or distance myself from their ethnic chauvinism. Again that is very untrue. I am as committed to the unity of this country as any patriot can be and I have publicly declared on many occasions that no person who threatens other Nigerians or parts of the country is acting on my behalf.

It is very regrettable that in your letter, you seem to place sole responsibility for the ongoing intrigues and tensions in the PDP at my doorstep, and going on from that position, you direct all your appeals for a resolution at me. Baba, let us all be truthful to ourselves, God and posterity. At the heart of all the current troubles in our party and the larger polity is the unbridled jostling and positioning for personal or group advantage ahead of the 2015 general elections. The “bitterness, anger, mistrust, fear and deep suspicion” you wrote about all flow from this singular factor. It is indeed very unfortunate that the seeming crisis in the party was instigated by a few senior members of the party, including you. But, as leader of the party, I will continue to do my best to unite it so that we can move forward with strength and unity of purpose.

The PDP has always recovered from previous crises with renewed vigour and vitality. I am very optimistic that that will be the case again this time. The PDP will overcome any temporary setback, remain a strong party and even grow stronger. Instigating people to cause problems and disaffection within the party is something that you are certainly familiar with. You will recall that founding fathers of the Party were frustrated out of the Party at a time. Late Chief Sunday Awoniyi was pushed out, Late Chief Solomon Lar left and later came back, Chief Audu Ogbeh and Chief Tom Ikimi also left. Chief Okwesilieze Nwodo left and later came back.

In 2005/2006, link-men were sent to take over party structures from PDP Governors in an unveiled attempt to undermine the state governors. In spite of that, the governors did not leave the Party because nobody instigated and encouraged them to do so. The charge that I was involved in anti-party activities in governorship elections in Edo, Ondo, Lagos, and AnambraStates is also very unfortunate. I relate with all Governors irrespective of political party affiliation but I have not worked against the interest of the PDP.

What I have not done is to influence the electoral process to favour our Party. You were definitely never so inclined, since you openly boasted in your letter of how you supported Alhaji Shehu Shagari against Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Chief Nnamdi Azikiwe and others in the 1979 presidential elections while serving as a military Head of State. You and I clearly differ in this regard, because as the President of Nigeria, I believe it is my duty and responsibility to create a level playing field for all parties and all candidates. Recalling how the PDP lost in states where we were very strong in 2003 and 2007 such as Edo, Ondo, Imo, Bauchi, Anambra, and Borno, longstanding members of our great party with good memory will also consider the charge of anti-party activities you made against me as misdirected and hugely hypocritical.

It certainly was not Goodluck Jonathan’s “personal ambition or selfish interest” that caused the PDP to lose the governorship of OgunState and all its senatorial seats in the last general elections. You quoted me as saying that I have not told anybody that I will seek another term in office in 2015. You and your ambitious acolytes within the party have clearly decided to act on your conclusion that “only a fool will believe that statement” and embark on a virulent campaign to harass me out of an undeclared candidature for the 2015 presidential elections so as to pave the way for a successor anointed by you. You will recall that you serially advised me that we should refrain from discussing the 2015 general elections for now so as not to distract elected public officials from urgent task of governance.

While you have apparently moved away from that position, I am still of the considered opinion that it would have been best for us to do all that is necessary to refrain from heating up the polity at this time. Accordingly, I have already informed Nigerians that I will only speak on whether or not I will seek a second term when it is time for such declarations. Your claims about discussions I had with you, Governor Gabriel Suswam and others are wrong, but in keeping with my declared stance, I will reserve further comments until the appropriate time.

Your allegation that I asked half a dozen African Presidents to speak to you about my alleged ambition for 2015, is also untrue. I have never requested any African President to discuss with you on my behalf. In our discussion, I mentioned to you that four Presidents told me that they were concerned about the political situation in Nigeria and intended to talk to you about it. So far, only three of them have confirmed to me that they have had any discussion with you. If I made such a request, why would I deny it? The issue of Buruji Kashamu is one of those lies that should not be associated with a former President. The allegation that I am imposing Kashamu on the South-West is most unfortunate and regrettable.

I do not even impose Party officials in my home state of Bayelsa and there is no zone in this country where I have imposed officials. So why would I do so in the South West? Baba, in the light of Buruji’s detailed public response to your “open letter”, it will be charitable for you to render an apology to Nigerians and I. On the issue of investors being scared to come to Nigeria, economic dormancy, and stagnation, I will just refer you to FDI statistics from 2000 to 2013.

Within the last three years, Nigeria has emerged as the preferred destination for investments in Africa, driven by successful government policies to attract foreign investors. For the second year running, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Investments (UNCTAD) has ranked Nigeria as the number one destination for investments in Africa, and as having the fourth highest returns in the world. Today, Nigeria is holding 18 percent of all foreign investments in Africa and 60 percent of all foreign investments in the ECOWAS Sub-Region.

Kindly note also that in the seven years between 2000 and 2007 when you were President, Nigeria attracted a total of $24.9 Billion in FDI. As a result of our efforts which you disparage, the country has seen an FDI inflow of $25.7 Billion in just three years which is more than double the FDI that has gone to the second highest African destination. We have also maintained an annual national economic growth rate of close to seven per cent since the inception of this administration.

What then, is the justification for your allegation of scared investors and economic dormancy? Although it was not emphasized in your letter of December 2, 2013, you also conveyed, in previous correspondence, the impression that you were ignorant of the very notable achievements of my administration in the area of foreign relations. It is on record that under my leadership, Nigeria has played a key role in resolving the conflicts in Niger, Cote d’Ivoire, Mali, Guinea Bissau and others. The unproductive rivalry that existed between Nigeria and some ECOWAS countries has also been ended under my watch and Nigeria now has better relations with all the ECOWAS countries.

At the African Union, we now have a Commissioner at the AU Commission after being without one for so long. We were in the United Nations Security Council for the 2010/2011 Session and we have been voted in again for the 2014/2015 Session. From independence to 2010, we were in the U.N. Security Council only three times but from 2010 to 2015, we will be there two times. This did not happen by chance. My Administration worked hard for it and we continue to maintain the best possible relations with all centres of global political and economic power. I find it hard therefore, to believe your assertions of untoward concern in the international community over the state of governance in Nigeria.

With respect to the Brass and Olokola LNG projects, you may have forgotten that though you started these projects, Final Investment Decisions were never reached. For your information, NNPC has not withdrawn from either the Olokola or the Brass LNG projects. On the Rivers State Water Project, you were misled by your informant. The Federal Government under my watch has never directed or instructed the Africa Development Bank to put on hold any project to be executed in Rivers state or any other State within the Federation. The Rivers Water Project was not originally in the borrowing plan but it was included in April 2013 and appraised in May. Negotiations are ongoing with the AfDB.

I have no doubt that you are familiar with the entire process that prefaces the signing of a Subsidiary Loan Agreement as in this instance. Let me assure you and all Nigerians that I do not engage in negative political actions and will never, as President, oppress the people of a State or deprive them of much needed public services as a result of political disagreement. I have noted your comments on the proposed National Conference. Contrary to the insinuation in your letter, the proposed conference is aimed at bringing Nigerians together to resolve contentious national issues in a formal setting. This is a sure way of promoting greater national consensus and unity, and not a recipe for “disunity, confusion and chaos” as you alleged in your letter.

Having twice held the high office of President, Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I trust that you will understand that I cannot possibly find the time to offer a line-by-line response to all the accusations and allegations made in your letter while dealing with other pressing demands of office and more urgent affairs of state. I have tried, however, to respond to only the most serious of the charges which question my sincerity, personal honour, and commitment to the oath which I have sworn, to always uphold and protect the interests of all Nigerians, and promote their well-being.

In closing, let me state that you have done me grave injustice with your public letter in which you wrongfully accused me of deceit, deception, dishonesty, incompetence, clannishness, divisiveness and insincerity, amongst other ills. I have not, myself, ever claimed to be all-knowing or infallible, but I have never taken Nigeria or Nigerians for granted as you implied, and I will continue to do my utmost to steer our ship of state towards the brighter future to which we all aspire. Please accept the assurances of my highest consideration and warm regards.

GOODLUCK EBELE JONATHAN

On APC’s visit to Obasanjo: Nigeria heading for shipwreck, says Wole Soyinka

Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka yesterday faulted the visit of All Progressives Congress, APC, leaders to former President Olusegun Obasanjo last Saturday warning that Nigeria was heading for a shipwreck with such political romance.

In his statement, titled: “Shipwreck Ahead”, Professor Soyinka cautioned that Nigeria would need rescue operations if the APC intends to court Obasanjo to serve as a navigator for the ship of the state.

According to Soyinka’s short statement, “an APC-led group, we understand, has been paying courtesy visits to former Heads of States. Would it be correct to state that their purpose is captured in the following Mission Statement? ‘Tinubu added that the APC had resolved to rescue Nigeria, appealing to Obasanjo to lead the mission. We’re resolved and determined to rescue Nigeria. We want you as navigator,’ he said.” Soyinka, then added: “If this attribution is correct, may I urge you, as an urgent public service, to advise families to begin the stockpiling of life-belts for the guaranteed crash.

Don’t forget to alert the coastguards—ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States), AU (African Union), UNO (United Nations Organization) etc, to be on the alert for possible salvage operations. “If General Sani Abacha were alive today, would he also have been on the ship’s complement? As Captain perhaps?”Soyinka asked.

Source: Vanguard

FG lavished N4.7trn in 8yrs, says Reps

The Public Accounts Committee, PAC, of the House of Representatives revealed at the weekend that over N4 trillion was spent from 2004 to 2012 by the Federal Government from Service-wide Vote without the approval of the National Assembly.

The committee said due process was not followed in the manner such a huge sum was lavished, noting that it contravened Section 80 of 1999 constitution.

The committee also alleged that between 2005 and 2006, the government of former President Olusegun Obasanjo spent N250 million to feed former President of Liberia, Charles Taylor and his family, who were on an asylum in the country.

Chairman of PAC, Adeola Olamilekan (APC-Lagos), who disclosed these at a briefing of journalists, said the expenditure was made without parliamentary approval, starting from the government of President Obasanjo to that of President Goodluck Jonathan.

Olamilekan explained that “most of the expenditures to which the Service-wide Vote releases were deployed are routine in nature and did not qualify for emergency funding. “For instance, between 2004 and 2012, a total of N1, 284,853,731.20 was spent on publicity and publication of various government programmes.
“Between 2004 and 2005, N250 million was spent on the upkeep of the former Liberian President, Charles Taylor, another  N14,006,494.847.57 was also released from the Service-wide Vote for the payment of judgement debts against the Federal Government.

“The office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, Budget Office and the Ministry of Finance released to their various offices a total of N2, 267,002,101 to a few auditors as audit fees and in 2011 alone, the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation paid out N809,358,504 as audit fees to some external auditors carrying out audit of the Federal Government financial activities instead of the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation.”

He also alleged that over N160 million was released for the Budget and Accountant General’s offices.
He said further:  “The expenditure of N162million from the 2011 Service Wide Votes releases tagged; “Closing Accounts” incurred jointly by the Office of the Accountant-General and the Budget Office of the Federation.

“An expenditure of N1,059,177,589.31($6,619,859.93 at the rate of $1=N160) in 201 and 2011 said to payment of outstanding tax on Nigeria House in New York.

“Successive governments have from 2004 to 2012. Spent a whopping N4.17 trillion  as against N1.8trillion  approved by the National Assembly as Service Wide Votes component of the budgets of those years, translating to N2.27trillion extra budgetary spending or 220% above the Service Wide Votes as approved in the budget for the period.”

He explained that “such extra-budgetary expenditures constitute a breach of Section 81 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999(as amended) and an illegality.” Olamilekan also said PAC  discovered in the course of its oversight that the Service-Wide Vote was converted to a recurrent fund by the government, instead of an infrastructure vote. “Such releases were mainly used to finance recurrent expenses not targeted at critical and strategic sectors of the economy and the releases were random and did not follow any clear pattern.

“The Service Wide Votes had become an alternative budget which government prefers to patronize than the annual budget, leading to poor implementation of the annual budget as approved by the National Assembly,” he added.

The report was earlier last Thursday presented by Olamilekan to the House which resolved that the committee should do more on its findings and present another report within two weeks. The Service Wide Wide is the fund set aside for emergency purposes.

Source: Vanguard

Rivers State: Another twin explosion

Governor Amaechi
ANOTHER twin explosion yesterday rocked Buguma, headquarters of Asaritoru Local Government Area, causing panic and tension.

The incident occurred in the evening during the inauguration of Asaritoru local government wing of Save Rivers Movement, at the Kalabari National College, KNC, premises.

When contacted for comment, the state Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Ahmad Muhammad, said he was not aware of the development.

It will be recalled that last week, explosives were hurled at the state deputy governor’s wing of Government House, Port Harcourt, a development that reportedly shattered the windscreen of some vehicles.

Barely twenty four hours after the incident at the deputy governor’s office, another explosion was reported at the official car park of Justice C. Wali in Ahoada East Local Government Area.

This incident came barely 48 hours after Justice Wali delivered a verdict stopping a member of the state House of Assembly, Evans Bipi, from parading as speaker of the state House of Assembly. Yesterday’s twin explosion at the KNC premises did not abort the inauguration of the Save Rivers Movement in the local government as it still went on smoothly after the panic generated by the incident had died down.

State Chairman of the SRM, Mr. Charles Ahonu, said the body would align with the All Progressives Congress, APC, describing it as the only party that could lead the state out of the woods. He said they were in the local government to inaugurate the wing of the SRM, adding that they were convinced in the ability of the APC to take the state to greater heights.

Interim chairman of the state chapter of the APC, Davies Ikanya, said Kalabari people had dumped the PDP for the APC in the state. Ikanya, who was chairman of the event, said the APC had also swept all parts of the state. He said the mother of all rallies of the APC would hold in the state today at the Liberation stadium, Port Harcourt.

Governor Chibuike Amaechi, members of the National Assembly in the party, the state legislators are among those he said would be in attendance.

Source: Vanguard

Nigeria's amalgamation was wrong, says Olisa Agbakoba

Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN)
LEADING human rights crusader and former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) spoke to Vanguard on the structure of Nigeria as a country, the worthiness of the forthcoming centenary celebrations, the crusade against graft among other issues.

Excerpts:

On Speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal’s comment that the executive arm of government does not have the capacity to fight corruption

It is a very weighty statement coming from the fourth man of government. I can’t verify or vouch for the statement and its accuracy but if I were the president, I will take it extremely seriously. And I think I will be concerned about whether or not the anti corruption strategy or policy is working. From the time of being the NBA president I have always advised that the anti corruption strategy is weak, and the reason why I felt it was weak is I feel the EFCC is very weak.

Apart from budgeting, capacity, there is nowhere in the world that the EFCC is saddled with three functions: investigate, prosecute and to recover asset.

In the UK, the National Center for Serious Crimes does the investigation, the Criminal Prosecution Service does the prosecution, and then the Assets Recovery agency deals with the asset recovery. From the day EFCC was set up to date how much has been recovered? Why are all these governors who are facing trials sitting in the Senate? It is now like their retiring place. The next thing now all the retiring governors will go to the Senate.

So whether or not the speaker is right is not the issue. The truth is that we have not seen strong anti-corruption measures come out because we don’t see anybody being convicted and that I think is the issue. The President Goodluck Jonathan government needs to take the anti-corruption programme a lot more seriously.

On PDP crisis and defection of G-5 governors to APC and implications for the polity

Nigeria has never had the opportunity to settle its constitutional arrangement. We have had three great eras: the colonial era, which amalgamated us in 1914, the independence era and the military era. Now, we have a pseudo-democratic era. We have to construct a paradigm that will galvanise Nigerians to fully believe in the political entity called Nigeria. The failure of that is that people look up for themselves.

So it is difficult to say we have any political party in Nigeria in the context we understand Democratic Party in the US or Labour Party in UK. So, it is very easy for people to cross carpet because they have no political conviction or ideology. I am not interested in whether a politician crossed from PDP to APC when I know they are one side of the same coin.

I am interested in what will come out of the new national conference and hopefully the elements that will pervade the discussion are first of all, everybody must talk-inclusion. Secondly, after the talks, the outcome shall be subject to no authority other than the National Assembly endorsing it. And before National Assembly endorses it, it ought to have legitimacy because what has been lacking in Nigeria constitution is legitimacy.

When all this is done and a new constitution emerges, you are likely to have those who want to seek political power doing so from political conviction. That will deal with the issue you raised. If I go into your question, I will be going into cause and effect scenario. The effect of cross-carpeting is weak political system. The effect of corruption is weak political system. The effect of ASUU fighting is weak political system. So I am more interested in a constructive and structural solution.

My approach to Nigeria’s development challenge is well expressed in Kingsley Moghalu’s new book, that unless we have a world view of where we want to go and how we want to go, we will never get it right. Once you get it right, the question of whether a political party is losing members will not arise.

On how to make national confab successful and Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu single term clamour

History has not produced this type of moment in a long time. Therefore, we must take it very seriously. I thought that the people who should be invited should be the ethnic nationalities, they make up Nigeria. And that it should not be a talk shop, we should have six geo-political mini conferences. So that as an Onitsha man, the challenge of an Onitsha man being governor of Anambra State is localised in the South-East and that is where we will discuss it.

But the challenge of South-East having equal states with the other zones is a matter for the national conference. So the mini-conference gives opportunity for the ethnic nationalities in the zone to shape out their problems, present their report and nominate 15 people to move forward. The other zones will also nominate 15 people each. At the national conference level, the representation should be equal.

If the presidency wishes to nominate 120 representatives is nothing wrong with it. He is the executive president, he has a view. There is nothing wrong with the National Assembly sending their representatives because you cannot exclude anybody. So let’s go there and talk. The important thing is the discussion should not be altered. If it says we should return to parliamentary system or Westminster model so be it.

If it says let’s retain presidential system or go for single tenure, which Senator Ike Ekweremadu irrelevantly brought in so be it. Even though he has a point, Ekweremadu brought it in wrongly. Every system has its political value. The way Ekweremadu’s point sounds, it is as if there is going to be mago mago or as if the National Assembly will receive the constitution and put a clause in it.

I wish he had not said that because I actually believe in that because Nigeria is in political evolution and one of the problems is succession. If that is the problem and we spend billions and trillions of naira then let people go for one term. I wish Ekweremadu had kept his powder dry and allowed it to be a common agreement. I hope that all these issues will be discussed at the conference.

On 100 years of amalgamation

Amalgamation is a big error. It was in the interest of the British. It has happened and so we should not cry over spilt milk.

We should not celebrate it. We should not honour it. It should be a sober reflection. We should say look, ‘here is what the British did to us, what can we do to overcome it and move forward because we want to be part of the comity of nations that expresses Nigeria’s greatness to be at the peak.

So, I do not lament it, I am sad about it, not just Nigeria but also how they sat at their Berlin Conference and tore the whole of Africa apart. Part of what you see in DRC, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Zimbabwe, etc is all down to that conference. But I am not going to lament it because those men are dead. The issue is how do we put the disastrous consequences behind us and move forward.

And all the elements of how to move forward are discussed in Kingsley Moghalu’s new book: Emerging Africa. I agree totally with it.

Africa cannot grow; Nigeria cannot grow without that context. It cannot happen if Boko Haram is on and we have ethnicisation of everything. Once we do so Nigeria will explode.

On opposition to Jonathan seeking re-election in 2015

It is his right to go. Clearly, he has the constitutional right to go because the constitution says two terms. The period of his acting president is not part of the two terms unless we amend the constitution to say the period of acting will count.

The problem about Jonathan going is the fact that power must rotate according to what the politicians have decided. The question of whether or not that rotation affects the people on the ground is secondary.
Jonathan is entitled constitutionally to go. Will he win? I don’t know. If he is going to win, he has to be seen to be doing the kind of things we have seen with Nelson Mandela’s death, where we can see that the feelings of South Africans for Mandela is genuine.

Politics in 2015, hopefully will be decided by the person who best understands Nigerians and gives them what they want.

No Nigerian president can win a free and fair election if he ignores the poverty of the common man. 2015 is not about Jonathan, it is about what any of the presidential candidates can do for the people that elected him.
We should be careful to avoid politicians creating tension that will make them beneficiaries of the situation. The media overplays and overemphasizes these quarrels. Meanwhile, Okonjo-Iweala is creating a micro finance bank that can give loans to people for 20 years; no one is talking about it.  The media is crushing Nigeria with bad news.